Home page BRF
Bereavement Research Forum
Research issues 3
Bereavement Research Forum
3. Deciding whether to engage in research 3.1 What is the role of research and who owns it? An initial question needs to be asked: ‘Does the organisation wish to engage in research, as a related but separate activity to that of primary caring/service delivery and audit?’ If the answer is yes, then the implication is that the research culture is ‘owned’ as an organisational commitment. Ownership implies commitment to the  * place of research within the overall enterprise of the agency  * activity of the research and an understanding about its effects on the emphasis and     priorities of ongoing service provision  * practice implications that are indicated by the research findings. Some research methods, such as ‘action research’, demand a very active ownership by the organisation because the ‘finding out’ is integrated within ongoing practice activity and practitioners are intensively used. Other methods may run in parallel with the primary care functions but will have resource implications for the agency (e.g. funding of interviewers, administrative support etc). 3.2 What is needed to support research? The support and supervision of researchers is just as important as it is for clinical practice. What available resources are there to undertake this? Do resources need to be developed? A structure is necessary to approve and monitor research projects within the strategic policy decided by the organisation/team. The questions central to decision making about individual pieces of work are:  * Does the proposal fit with the organisational aims? (Organisational aims may need    to be revisited and/or clarified in order to answer this question).  * Does the proposal fit with good research practice? i.e. Is it ethical and practical?  * From an organisation point of view is the timing right?  * What are the resource implications – human and financial? A group needs to be designated, either as part of an existing function or with a specific research responsibility, to approve research projects (i.e. to function as an ‘ethics committee’ or to prepare a presentation for an external ethics committee) and to monitor the progress of the research project. (A suggested organisational protocol for undertaking ethical research is provided in Appendix One) Key considerations in reviewing the issue of research are:  * The place of research within organisational strategy  * The prioritising of themes and issues for research attention  * The structures and protocols for the approval and monitoring of projects  * The means of ensuring the resource base exists to sustain research and     researchers  * The means by which research will be put into practice McLeod, J. (1993) An Introduction to Counselling. Buckingham: Open University Press Parkes. C.M. (1995) Guidelines for Conducting Ethical Research Death Studies:19,171-181 Silverman PR (2000) Research, clinical practice and the human experience: putting the pieces togetherDeath Studies: 24, 469-478. Stroebe M, Hanson RO, Stroebe W and Schut H. (2001) Handbook of bereavement research: consequences, coping and care. Washington: American Psychological Association
4 Summary
References